EmptyMessage board »Message Board home »Sign-in or register to get started
Online now: 7 members: Chris31, DaveOutlaw44, Lachelle8442, SupremeAthletics, T-mon, cecil, shortstop13; 13 anonymousDiscussion: Full tourney results?
| Posted | Discussion |
| March 26 lowprofile 65 posts | Hello SSUSA, I know this is a sore topic and an issue to many of us ball players, as with most of us we know many teams and players and would love to see how they did or how there doing? Maybe six months ago this was brought up in another post and barbs were thrown. I defended it saying basically SSUSA is aware and im guessing there probably trying to figure out how to get the scores of ALL the games up in a timely manor. My qestion is...Is there anything in the works to try to get the scores up the same day or within a couple days lol with some new technology? I personaly love it when the whole bracket is filled out with the scores and not just the top three finishers posted WITH NO SCORES on the tournament page. I dont want this to get into a heated disscusion just wondering if SSUSA is addressing this? and if not no biggie will live with what we get. if anyone else disagrees with my statements please let me know. |
| March 26 DaveDowell Men's 70 4321 posts | Yep, it's being adressed but the timing of the technical programming side is not in my control ... It's been in process developmentally for over two years, which isn't ideal ... I'll let others be the judge on events of late, but the TOC was posted the night it ended and the Spring Nationals were posted in their entirety on Sunday evening, the day it ended ... The MESQUITE sectioon of the Spring Worlds was also posted in its entirety Sunday evening ... The BHC/KINGMAN paperwork component of the Spring Worlds was hand delivered this afternoon by a Director who was there, and I'll begin processing on that within the next couple of days (hopefully) ... Today has been spent drafting the complete Tidewater Classic (Virginia Beach) schedule, which will post yet this (Tuesday) evening ... No excuses offered, not needed, but that's the current status ... Thanks! |
| March 26 lowprofile 65 posts | Dave that sounds great, I did notice the big tourneys have the brackets complete, the smaller ones not so much, but that's cool. I do get it that it's hard to come up with something as large as some of the tourneys you guys put on especially when there's the seeding games!so I guess as long as it's in the back of your guy's minds that's all we can ask, keep up the great work sir. One more question off topic if I may as I didn't want to start another post, As I look at the tourneys for the year for the South Western area Cal and Arizona I took 2 divisions 50s and 55s being most popular and noticed there's almost twice as many tourneys in Az as opposed to Ca.? 15(Az) / 8(Cal) but team wise there's 106 Ca. teams to 32 Az teams, just in So. Cal alone there's 52 teams, why such disparity tourney wise when Ca. has almost 3 times as many teams? Seems like you guys could make a heck of a lot more money having tourneys in Ca. as opposed to Az.(nothing against Az. fine state!) I'm thinking not a lot of Ca. teams are traveling to Az for any small tourneys. I did not go back prior years so maybe your alternating years and this year is AZ turn for more tourneys or is it this way every year? either way just wondering the thinking behind it. |
